PENGATURAN HAK INGKAR NOTARIS DAN PELAKSANAANYA PASCA PUTUSAN MK 49/PUU-X/2012

marthalena, refningsih (2018) PENGATURAN HAK INGKAR NOTARIS DAN PELAKSANAANYA PASCA PUTUSAN MK 49/PUU-X/2012. Masters thesis, UNIVERSITAS ANDALAS.

	Text (COVER DAN ABSRAK) COVER DAN ABSTRAK PDF.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (188kB)
Preview	Text (BAB 1) BAB 1 PDF.pdf - Published Version Download (396kB) | Preview
Preview	Text (BAB AKHIR/PENUTUP) BAB AKHIR PDF.pdf - Published Version Download (139kB) | Preview
Preview	Text (DAFTAR PUSTAKA) DAFTAR PUSTAKA PDF.pdf - Published Version Download (155kB) | Preview
	Text (TESIS FULL) TESIS FULL PDF.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Repository staff only Download (1MB)

Abstract

PENGATURAN HAK INGKAR NOTARIS DAN PELAKSANAANNYA PASCA PUTUSAN MK NOMOR : 49/PUU-X/2012 MarthalenaRefningsih ABSTRAK NotarismerupakanPejabatUmumberwenangmembuataktaotentikdankewenanganlainnyasebagaimanadiaturdalamundang-Undang. DalammenjalankanjabatannyanotarismempunyaihakimunyaituhakingkarsebagaimanadiaturdalamUndang-UndangNomor 20 tahun 2004 tentangjabatannotaris, salahsatupasal yang mengaturtentanghakingkartersebutdiaturdalampasal 66 ayat (1) UUJN, namundenganadanyaujimateriterhadappasal 66 tersebutdandinyatakantidakmempunyaikekuatanhukummengikat. Adapunrumusanmasalahdalampenelitianiniadalah: 1) BagaimanapengaturanhakingkarnotarissebelumdansesudahPutusan MK Nomor : 49/PUU-X/2012?2) BagamanapelaksanaanhakingkarnotarispascaPutusan MK Nomor : 49/PUU-X/2012?. Metodependekatanutama yang digunakandalampenelitianiniadalahpendekatanyuridisnormatifyaitupenelitian yang menekankanpadaaspek–aspekhukum, dengancaramempelajaribahan–bahanhukum primer danhukumsekunder yang nantinyadijadikanpedomandalammemahamidanmenganalisispermasalahan yang dibahas, sedangkansebagaipendukungpendekatanutamadigunakanpendekatanyuridisempiris. Pembahasan: 1)sejakdisahkannya UU Nomor: 30 Tahun 2004 hakingkarnotarisdiaturdalamPasal 4, Pasal 16, Pasal 54 danPasal 66 ayat (1), Kemudiandengankeluarnyaputusan MK Nomor : 49/PUU-X-2012, yang mengabulkanpermohonanujimateriterhadapPasal 66 ayat (1) sehingga MPD tidakmempunyaikewenanganlagi, danpadatahun 2014 diundangkanlagi UUJN-P Nomor; 2 tahun 2014 denganmunculnyakembaliPasal 66 tentang MKN yang mempunyaifungsi yang samadengan MPD.2)PascaPutusan MK Nomor 49/PUU-X-2012 terkaiddengantelahdibatalkannyafrasapersetujuanMajelisPengawas Daerah dalampasal 66 ayat (1) UUJN tidakadalagiperlindunganterhadaphakingkarkarenapenyidik, penuntutumumdan hakim dapatmemanggildanmengambilfoto copy minutaaktasertasurat-surat yang beradadalampenyimpanannyasecaralangsungtanpapersetujuan MPD. Dan setelahkeluarnya UUJNP implementasipasal 66 seolahtidakberfungsikarenaaturankhususmengenai MKN sendiribaru di aturdalamPermenkumhamnomor: 7 tahun 2016. Kata Kunci :Notaris, HakIngkar THE RULE OF A NOTARIAL REFUSAL RIGHT AND APLICATION POST OF CONTITUTIONAL COURT VERDICT NO 49/PUU-X/2012 Refningsih, Martalena ABSTRACT Notary is public officials has the authority in writing an authentic deed and others as stated in the constitution. However, notary has also the right of immunity i.e. refusal right stated in Law No. 20 of 2014 on position of Notary, One of article regulated as to notarial refusal right is article 66 of law no. 2 of 2014 on potition of notary (UUJN), but in consequence of judicial review to the article had no binding legal force. Issues in the research are : a) How to regulate notarial refusal right pre and post of contitutional court verdict No. 49/PUU-X/2012 ? 2) How to aplicate notarial refusal right post of contitutional court verdict No. 49/PUU-X/2012 ? The main approach method of the research conducted by means of normative juridicial approach that’s focused on the law aspects, by studying primary and secondary legal material to be orientation in understanding and analyzing studied issues, whereas the main supported approach used empirical juridis. The research result : 1) Since Law No. 30 of 2004 ratified notarial refusal right regulated in Article 4, Article 16, Article 54 and Article 66 verse (1), But by being promulgated of contitutional court verdict No. 49/PUU-X/2012, requested judicial review of Article 66 verse (1) Regional Supervision Board of Notarial had no authority anymore, in 2014 Law No. 2 of 2014 (UUJN) ratified by reappearing Article 66 verse (1) concerning Honorary Assembly Notary (MKN) has as the same function as Regional Supervision Board (MPD. 2) post of contitutional court verdict No. 49/PUU-X/2012 related to cancellation of phrase of Regional Supervision Board Agreement in Article 66 verse (1) of UUJN there was no protection to notarial refusal right since investigating officer, district attorney and judge able to call a notary and take copy of original of the deed and also all of documents saved by notary without MPD agreement. Nevertheles, After ratified the canges of the law on position of notary Article 66 implementation as if it wasn’t work in consequence of spesified regulation on MKN itself ruled in regulation of Ministry of Justice and Human Right No. 7 of 2016. Key Word : Notary, Notarial Refusal Right

Actions (login required)

View Item