An Analysis of Cooperative Principles on Asumsi.co’s Interviews on Russia-Ukraine War Issue

Hafiz, Alfandi Rizqy (2023) An Analysis of Cooperative Principles on Asumsi.co’s Interviews on Russia-Ukraine War Issue. Masters thesis, Universitas Andalas.

	Text (Cover dan Abstrak) Cover & Abstract.pdf - Published Version Download (373kB)
	Text (Chapter I) Chapter I.pdf - Published Version Download (257kB)
	Text (Chapter V) Chapter V.pdf - Published Version Download (219kB)
	Text (Reference) Referensi.pdf - Published Version Download (303kB)
	Text (Thesis Full) Thesis Full.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Repository staff only Download (918kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Cooperative Principle is one of the linguistic disciplines that should be known by everyone to conduct effective communication, especially diplomats. This research studied the utterances which were uttered by two Russian diplomats who are actively working at the Russian Embassy in Indonesia, Denis Tetyushin and Lyudmila Vorobyova in their interviews with Asumsi.co. The objective of this research was to identify the maxims of cooperative principle which are produced by the interviewees in the Asumsi.co interviews, to figure out the types of maxims disobedience which are produced by the interviewees, and to recognise the motives behind the interviewees obeying and disobeying the maxims. This study was conducted with a qualitative approach assisted by a statistical descriptive method to see the distribution of the obedience and disobedience utterances. The result of the research revealed 47 data obey and disobey the maxim of cooperative principles. The most obeyed maxim was the maxim of manner, followed by the maxim of quantity, the maxim of quality, and there was no utterance which followed the maxim of relevance rule. The motivation of these interviewees obeyed the maxims because they wanted to giving a brief answer to the interviewers. On the other hand, the most dominant type of disobedience was the violation of quantity with, flouting maxim of manner, the maxim of quality violation, flouting the maxim of quality. In addition, it was followed by flouting maxim quantity, maxim violation of relevance, and manner, because both interviewees put more elaborations on their answers due to clarifying something to the interviewers.

Actions (login required)

View Item