THE ANALYSIS OF COMPLIMENTS AND COMPLIMENTS RESPONSES WITHIN FAN-ARTIST COMMUNITY AT TWITTER

Nur, Erika Chaniago (2023) THE ANALYSIS OF COMPLIMENTS AND COMPLIMENTS RESPONSES WITHIN FAN-ARTIST COMMUNITY AT TWITTER. Diploma thesis, Universitas Andalas.

	Text (Cover and Abstrak) Abstrak.pdf - Published Version Download (273kB)
	Text (Chapter 1) Bab 1 Pendahuluan.pdf - Published Version Download (411kB)
	Text (Chapter 4) Bab 4 Penutup.pdf - Published Version Download (257kB)
	Text (BIBLIOGRAPHY) Daftar Pustaka.pdf - Published Version Download (257kB)
	Text (Full Thesis) FullThesis - NurErikaChaniago.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Repository staff only Download (2MB)

Abstract

This study aimed to explain the types of compliment’s objects received by the fan-artist and the types of compliment responses offered by the fan-artists on Twitter. The researcher searched 10 users who shared their fan-arts in the Twitter, and there are 25 fan-art posts that contained compliments and compliment responses. Of the 25 posts, the comments that required the criteria above would be transferred to a sheet in Microsoft Excel and would be analyzed by Wolfson's theory (1993), Holmes (1988), and Herbert (1986) theory. The result shows that, according to Wolfson's theory (1993), and this study found the compliment data utterances showing that there are 6 topics of Possession data and 244 topics of Skill/Ability/Performance, 0 Appearance, 0 Personality/Friendship, and 0 Others data. According to the Holmes (1988) divided the syntactic patterns of the compliments into six types, which are 225 NP be (intensifier) ADJ, 0 be LOOKing (intensifier) ADJ, 4 I (intensifier) like/love NP, 0 PRO (be) a/an (intensifier) ADJ/NP, PRO (be) (intensifier) (a/an) ADJ/NP, 4 What a (ADJ) NP!, 17 (intensifier) (ADJ) NP, and 0 Isn’t NP ADJ!. According to Herbert (1986), the researcher finds out twelve types of compliments response. The highest frequency of the data belongs to topics of 122 Appreciation Token, 48 Comment Acceptance, 38 No Acknowledgement, 21 Return, 14 Comment History, 5 Qualification, 1 Praise Upgrade, 1 Reassignment, 1 Question, 0 Request Interpretation data, 0 Scale Down, and, 0 Disagreement.

Actions (login required)

View Item