MARISA, JEMMY (2016) PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MEMUTUS PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA MEMBUJUK ANAK MELAKUKAN PERSETUBUHAN DENGANNYA YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH ANAK DI WILAYAH HUKUM PENGADILAN NEGERI BATUSANGKAR(Kajian Terhadap Putusan Nomor: 1/Pid.Sus-Anak/2015/PN BSK). Masters thesis, Universitas Andalas.
|
Text (ABSTRAK)
ABSTRACK.pdf - Published Version Download (59kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text (BAB I)
BAB I.pdf - Published Version Download (85kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text (BAB AKHIR)
BAB AKHIR.pdf - Published Version Download (29kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text (DAFTAR PUSTAKA)
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf - Published Version Download (33kB) | Preview |
|
Text (Tesis Full text)
Tesis Full Text.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Repository staff only Download (1MB) |
Abstract
CONSIDERATION OF JUDGES TOWARD THE CHILDREN WHO DO PERSUADE INTERCOURSE CRIME BY HIM IN BATUSANGKAR JURISDICTION COURT (Decision Studies Number: 1/Pid.Sus-Anak/2015/PN BSK) (Marisa Jemmy, 1420112034, , Magister of Andalas University, 2016, 111 Pages) Pembimbing: Prof. Dr. Ismansyah, S.H, M.H dan Aria Zurnetti, S.H, M.Hum ABSTRACT Child is legacy of nation goal in struggle. Child in development process and in the way to self-recognition is face abnormal attitude or called “Juvenile Delinquency”. To prevent and countermeasures could held the child court jurisdiction. To hold the child court jurisdiction is not getting far from the protection and maintenance purpose which is point on prosperity. Otherwise, the child court jurisdiction is still act in prison punishment domination. Law consideration of judges in crime final prosecution toward criminal intercourse actor to the child and according to decision number: 1/Pid.Sus-Anak/2015/PN-BSK with the constitution number 11/2012 about child jurisdiction court system which is becoming study formulation in this research. On this situation, study on judes consideration which is pointing on reconstruction and justice to victim, criminal actor, family and society. This study used jurisdiction-sociologic method and used primary and secondary data, then collecting data by field study with interview and library studies. From this research in Batusangkar Jurisdiction court, we conclude that prison criminal final prosecution by the judge toward child who did crime is not irresponsibly from prison criminal punishment due to non-jurisdicstion principle. Even though the purpose from Judges Consideration is not prisoning, sanctions measures, impose a sentence of imprisonment trial, prison until the ends of detention and factors on which to base criminal punishment against children as perpetrators are juridical and sociological factors are taken into consideration in one unit. So of these factors are decisive in imposing imprisonment by Judge. Keywords: Imposition of Criminal Prison, Judges Consideration and Children
Item Type: | Thesis (Masters) |
---|---|
Subjects: | K Law > KD England and Wales |
Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum |
Depositing User: | s2 ilmu hukum |
Date Deposited: | 27 Jun 2016 05:57 |
Last Modified: | 27 Jun 2016 05:57 |
URI: | http://scholar.unand.ac.id/id/eprint/11713 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |